Totally. You know I'm all for people getting to know themselves and their partners and what works and what doesn't, but to say that scientists say that the G-spot doesn't exist so don't write about that, or that 70% of women can't orgasm from penetration, so don't write a character who's in that 30% (or who just enjoys it despite not orgasming, which...I think is another thing that should stop getting policed is what defines good or bad sex).
I'd rather people maybe see guides to lesbian sex as a starting point for ideas and then tailor it for what appeals to them and what works for the character. But I wouldn't want there to be this idea that a good f/f sex scene needs to have x, y, and z in order to be 'realistic' sex.
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
branchandroot
Re: Warning: Incoming TL;DR, TMI, and NSFW descriptions of female sex acts
Date: 2010-05-03 06:07 am (UTC)I'd rather people maybe see guides to lesbian sex as a starting point for ideas and then tailor it for what appeals to them and what works for the character. But I wouldn't want there to be this idea that a good f/f sex scene needs to have x, y, and z in order to be 'realistic' sex.