Religion and femmeslash

[twtd]

Religion and femmeslash- How does a character's religion/beliefs (or lack their of) influence what and how you read/write?

I feel like this is a bit of a cop out, but it depends on the character and the story. These are just some examples from my own experiences.

The one non AU Guiding Light Olivia/Natalia fic that I considered writing was going to be a rumination on Natalia's faith structured around the Latin Mass, so for that it was going to be incredibly important. Part of the reason that I wanted to write it was because I felt like a lot of fic writers were ignoring that aspect of her character, when the show was clearly making her relationship with the Catholic Church incredibly important to her. But then I couldn't find a plot, so it never got written.

When I wrote Vows, I gave a lot of thought to Emily, JJ, and Will's religion and then the show went and totally Jossed me in regards to Emily, who I never would have pegged as Catholic. Also, JJ wasn't the one that got blown up at the end of that season, but that wasn't as important to me. I have a little pet peeve about how the only people on TV that have any sort of interesting religion based story lines are either Catholic or Jewish, as if your average Lutheran or Methodist can't have a crisis of faith. But that's a whole different topic.

Anyway, I put the thought into it because I knew the fic would be structured around wedding vows, and I didn't want to just use some generic set, because I was trying to contrast the actual vows being taken with Emily's thoughts. As Will is from New Orleans, there's a pretty good chance that he's Catholic, but Catholic ceremonies don't really lend themselves well to hospital bedside weddings, so I really focused on JJ, the fact that she's from Pennsylvania, which certainly has a diverse and interesting religious history, and her general socio-economic background. And I decided that Will would be perfectly happy honoring her religious choices. So the vows that run through the story are Quaker, mainly because I liked them the best and I liked the double meaning around the word "Friends" in the first line.

Because I felt like Emily came from old blood American WASP elites, and we didn't know anything else at the time, I went with her being Episcopalian. So when she thinks, "Marriage is a lifelong union and not to be entered into lightly," it's taken from Episcopal wedding vows. And I did all of that not because the characters have ever shown (up to that point) as being particularly religious, but because weddings in American society are, to me, inherently religious events.

So basically, if the canon emphasizes a character's religion, or if it's inherent to the story, then it absolutely influences what I write. If I was writing about Callie and Arizona, then Callie's struggles with her faith would probably be in the back of my mind as I wrote it, just like Arizona's relationship to the military, and a million other things that we know about the characters. If I was writing Avatar:TLA fic, I would try to keep in mind that it takes place in a society without any Judeo-Christian underpinnings. On the other hand, if I was writing about Andi and Miranda, I probably wouldn't think about it as much or even at all.

I'm sure there are lots of other experiences out there though, and I'd love lots of other answers to this.

Comments

[havocthecat]

I'm confused. Not offended, but confused. How do you perceive Catholicism as an "ultimate ur-religion?" Or maybe what I should be asking is that I'm curious as to why you believe the public perceives Catholicism that way?

To the best of my understanding, there are a number of sects of Christianity that consider Catholics to be pagans or heretics of some kind, and that their form of Christianity is the true and real form, that the Catholics lost the path a long time ago. I've also been given to understand that other sects of Christianity consider themselves to be the true inheritors of "proper" Christianity, and the Popes and the Vatican have been lying about having the keys to the Kingdom of God for centuries now.

Catholics consider themselves to be the original form of Christianity, of course, with a line of spiritual descent stretching down from St. Peter himself. But I've been given to understand that, basically, they're the only form of Christianity who believe that.

Plus it's hard to consider Catholicism as an ur-religion, in my opinion, when it's very definitely split from Judaism, with a strong enough descent that the entire Torah was absorbed into the Old Testament of the Christian Bible.

(I grew up Catholic, received plenty of Catholic eduction, questioned a lot of it, decided I was some form of eclectic pagan, lapsed from that, and married a Jewish man, but never converted.)

Anyway, like I said, I am thoroughly not offended, but looking for clarification. Also, I really enjoy talking about stuff like this. :)

[twtd]

When I said, "the public" I really meant, "the public as perceived by Hollywood," which I imagine wouldn't exactly line up with exact public opinion if we took a poll on it. I just think that Hollywood often romanticizes Catholicism. It seems like if there's a character who's religion plays a significant role in their story line, they're either going to be Catholic or Jewish (excepting for bad Muslim terrorist stereotypes). This might be because of demographics of Hollywood writers/producers (I don't know those demographics), or it might be because there are easy signifiers of both of those religions, ie a rosary, going to confession, priest/nun, a yarmulke, words in Yiddish or Hebrew, stereotypical physical appearance. They both come with specific cultural assumptions that then become easy short hand for characterization. Why does character X feel guilty about Y? Well, because she's Catholic, and everyone knows about Catholic guilt, right?

Seriously, when was the last time you watched a tv show with sympathetic religious characters who weren't Jewish or Catholic? Even harder, name me one who was actually associated with a specific denomination of Christianity.

Seventh Heaven and Touched by an Angel don't count, mainly because I said so. Community doesn't count either because they're essentially making fun of all of the things TV takes for granted. The only show on my list after that is Friday Night Lights, and that's a show with a tremendous sense of how place affects character.

So I'm not really talking actual theology here in any way. I'm going more for perceived, stereotypical assumptions about religion on tv.

I really think that this could be a piece of meta on it's own, or even an academic paper, but the whole, "OMG Christianity is being discriminated against!!11!!!1!" undercurrent of it makes me vaguely uncomfortable, because I certainly don't think that's true. I imagine that most people watching TV assume some sort of default, generic Christianity for most of the characters on the shows they watch.

[phoenix64]

I'm only going to address the Catholicism vs. the rest of Christianity aspect of this, but I suspect a lot of it has to do with perceptions about liberals and conservatives as pertains to religion.

American Catholics have a reputation as a fairly liberal bunch, or at least containing a lot of people who are comfortable being liberal and more or less comfortable being Catholic. Writing a character on TV as Catholic is an easy shortcut to portray the character as liberal but not so liberal that they're Godless atheists. But outside of Catholicism the perception is that when people hear "Christianity in America" a lot of them are going to think of evangelicals and the Moral Majority (OK, showing my age) and all the types that come across as prudish, sexist and homophobic. I imagine to most TV writers challenging those perceptions seems risky and unrewarding so they stick to the easy path and then perpetuate those stereotypes.

It really is unfortunate. You mentioned Quakers - I'd love to see more Quakers on TV! Not to mention Buddhists that aren't Tiger Woods, but that's another issue entirely.

[doyle]

To the best of my understanding, there are a number of sects of Christianity that consider Catholics to be pagans or heretics of some kind

There are certainly branches of Protestantism* that would look askance at things that would be normal in a Catholic church - like statues in church, or representations of Christ on the cross. I was raised Presbyterian in the 80s/90s and there'd often be ridiculous tracts in the church vestibule with titles like "My journey of salvation: from Catholicism to Christ". That's pretty much what I was taught in school too. (Admittedly I'm from Northern Ireland, where the Protestant/Catholic divide is, uh, historically fairly important. See: one of our politicians - in the 21st century! - announcing that the Pope is literally the anti-Christ, etc.)

* There's a huge variation in belief between Protestant denominations, or even between various branches of Presbyterians. Just going on girls I went to school with: some had to cover their hair in church (multiple outings to church on a Sunday), and trousers in church were strictly out. Some weren't allowed to ever cut their hair, and trousers were always banned. Some weren't allowed to drink or dance, even at weddings, even something like line dancing (it's an "incitement to lust"). Some believed you'd go to hell for any games that involved playing cards (because they're "the devil's cards"). Most, like me, were from more moderate backgrounds where you got dragged to Sunday School but you were allowed to dance and wear trousers and play cards and were bemused by all this.

[havocthecat]

There's a huge variation in belief between Protestant denominations, or even between various branches of Presbyterians.

Um, yes, I know. I grew up Catholic; I didn't grow up surrounded by only Catholics. I also had to study various sects of Christianity as part of my Catholic education.

[doyle]

Apologies, I didn't mean that specifically for you, but for anyone reading the thread (since the person below said she wasn't familiar with branches of Christianity.)